START HERE
Two-page orientation for a first-time reviewer.
GAIX-FIP-001-00_START_HERE
Text on this page: v0.1.1
The narrow proposition, START HERE, the Specification Authority Manifest, Claims / Non-Claims, the Threat Model & Failure Modes, and the Known Limitations.
The inspection question Can current standing and authority be made a precondition to a protected consequential transition under the conditions that exist at the relevant decision boundary?
You can attack this at two implemented decision boundaries, on synthetic fixtures with a mock provider only: R2's authorization of a MergeProposal INSPECTED → ACCEPTED transition, and R3's Canon admission decision. Bind-time enforcement at model submission is specified but not implemented; it is a hypothesis, not a claim.
Two-page orientation for a first-time reviewer.
GAIX-FIP-001-00_START_HERE
Text on this page: v0.1.1
Which artifacts govern interpretation, and their recorded standing and provenance.
GAIX-FIP-001-SPECIFICATION-AUTHORITY-MANIFEST
Text on this page: v0.1.2 — accepted text, complete and verbatim (the title line is included)
Every claim, hypothesis and non-claim, with its class and ceiling.
GAIX-FIP-001-CLAIMS-NONCLAIMS-REGISTER
Text on this page: v0.1.2 — accepted text, complete and verbatim (the title line is included)
The failure conditions reviewers are invited to attack, with coverage classification.
GAIX-FIP-001-THREAT-MODEL-AND-FAILURE-MODES
Text on this page: v0.1.2 — accepted text, complete and verbatim (the title line and the document header table are included)
Every recorded limitation, its status or release effect, and the closure rule.
GAIX-FIP-001-KNOWN-LIMITATIONS-REGISTER
Text on this page: v0.1.2 — accepted text, complete and verbatim (the title line is included)
Reading these documents confers no license, no access right and no implementation authority. See the Intellectual Property notice and the Evaluation / Inspection boundary.